Teach Children How to Be Successful InvestorsIf you ask successful investors（投资者）how they learned their first lessons about money, they'll probably tell you their parents taught them. The money values we learned as children stay with us the rest of our lives.1.______ Here are some suggestions for you to teach your child about investment:Help your child begin to save. Open savings accounts（储蓄账户）for your children, and teach them how the bank makes their money grow. 2______ You may even want to set up a matching program, contributing fifty cents fbr each dollar your child saves.Teach your child about stocks（股票）.3______ Once your child understands the basics, ask him or her to think about some of the businesses that might be good stock investments. Then choose a suitable fund（基金）for your child. 4______ These funds can be a good way to teach children about the stock market while saving for their college education.Encourage early IRA（个人退休金账户）saving. This is a great way for children who are working in summers or after school to begin saving for their future. 5______ Let your kids handle their own money.We all learn by doing, so letting your kids manage some of their money will let them earn valuable financial lessons. They may make mistakes, but they may help them avoid larger mistakes as adults.5.

假设你在China Daily上看到一家公司招聘计算机工程师的广告，请给他们写一封120词左右的申请信。内容应包括：(1) Why do you choose the company；(2) Why do you think that you are capable for the position.

Mary MooreWhen Mary Moore began her high school in 1951, her mother told her, “Be sure and take a typing course so when this show business thing doesn' t work out, you'll have something to rely on.” Mary responded in typical teenage fashion. From that moment on, “the very last thing I ever thought about doing was taking a typing course，”she recalls.The show business thing worked out, of course. In her career, Mary won many awards. Only recently, when she began to write Growing Up Again, did she regret ignoring what her mom said, “I don't know how to use a computer,”she admits.Unlike her 1995 autobiography, After All, her second book is less about life as an award- winning actress and more about living with diabetes（糖尿病）.All the money from the book is intended for the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation （JDRF）, an organization she serves as international chairman.But she hasn't always practiced what she teaches. In her book, she describes that awful day, almost 40 years ago, when she received two pieces of life-changing news. First, she had lost the baby she was carrying, and second, tests showed that she had diabetes. In a childlike act, she left the hospital and treated herself to a box of doughnuts（甜甜圈）.Years would pass before she realized she had to grow up—again—and take control of her diabetes, not let it control her. Only then did she kick her three-pack-a-day cigarette habit, overcome her addiction to alcohol, and begin to follow a balanced diet.Although her disease has affected her eyesight and forced her to the sidelines of the dance floor, she refuses to fall into self-pity."Everybody on earth can ask, ‘why me?’ about something or other," she insists.“It doesn't do any good. No one is immune（免疫的）to heartache, pain, and disappointments. Sometimes we can make things better by helping others. I've come to realize the importance of that as I've grown up this second time. I want to speak out and be as helpful as I can be.”1.Why did Mary feel regretful?

Mary MooreWhen Mary Moore began her high school in 1951, her mother told her, “Be sure and take a typing course so when this show business thing doesn' t work out, you'll have something to rely on.” Mary responded in typical teenage fashion. From that moment on, “the very last thing I ever thought about doing was taking a typing course，”she recalls.The show business thing worked out, of course. In her career, Mary won many awards. Only recently, when she began to write Growing Up Again, did she regret ignoring what her mom said, “I don't know how to use a computer,”she admits.Unlike her 1995 autobiography, After All, her second book is less about life as an award- winning actress and more about living with diabetes（糖尿病）.All the money from the book is intended for the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation （JDRF）, an organization she serves as international chairman.But she hasn't always practiced what she teaches. In her book, she describes that awful day, almost 40 years ago, when she received two pieces of life-changing news. First, she had lost the baby she was carrying, and second, tests showed that she had diabetes. In a childlike act, she left the hospital and treated herself to a box of doughnuts（甜甜圈）.Years would pass before she realized she had to grow up—again—and take control of her diabetes, not let it control her. Only then did she kick her three-pack-a-day cigarette habit, overcome her addiction to alcohol, and begin to follow a balanced diet.Although her disease has affected her eyesight and forced her to the sidelines of the dance floor, she refuses to fall into self-pity."Everybody on earth can ask, ‘why me?’ about something or other," she insists.“It doesn't do any good. No one is immune（免疫的）to heartache, pain, and disappointments. Sometimes we can make things better by helping others. I've come to realize the importance of that as I've grown up this second time. I want to speak out and be as helpful as I can be.”2.We can know that before 1995 Mary ______.

Mary MooreWhen Mary Moore began her high school in 1951, her mother told her, “Be sure and take a typing course so when this show business thing doesn' t work out, you'll have something to rely on.” Mary responded in typical teenage fashion. From that moment on, “the very last thing I ever thought about doing was taking a typing course，”she recalls.The show business thing worked out, of course. In her career, Mary won many awards. Only recently, when she began to write Growing Up Again, did she regret ignoring what her mom said, “I don't know how to use a computer,”she admits.Unlike her 1995 autobiography, After All, her second book is less about life as an award- winning actress and more about living with diabetes（糖尿病）.All the money from the book is intended for the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation （JDRF）, an organization she serves as international chairman.But she hasn't always practiced what she teaches. In her book, she describes that awful day, almost 40 years ago, when she received two pieces of life-changing news. First, she had lost the baby she was carrying, and second, tests showed that she had diabetes. In a childlike act, she left the hospital and treated herself to a box of doughnuts（甜甜圈）.Years would pass before she realized she had to grow up—again—and take control of her diabetes, not let it control her. Only then did she kick her three-pack-a-day cigarette habit, overcome her addiction to alcohol, and begin to follow a balanced diet.Although her disease has affected her eyesight and forced her to the sidelines of the dance floor, she refuses to fall into self-pity."Everybody on earth can ask, ‘why me?’ about something or other," she insists.“It doesn't do any good. No one is immune（免疫的）to heartache, pain, and disappointments. Sometimes we can make things better by helping others. I've come to realize the importance of that as I've grown up this second time. I want to speak out and be as helpful as I can be.”3.Mary's second book Growing Up Again is mainly about her ______.

Mary MooreWhen Mary Moore began her high school in 1951, her mother told her, “Be sure and take a typing course so when this show business thing doesn' t work out, you'll have something to rely on.” Mary responded in typical teenage fashion. From that moment on, “the very last thing I ever thought about doing was taking a typing course，”she recalls.The show business thing worked out, of course. In her career, Mary won many awards. Only recently, when she began to write Growing Up Again, did she regret ignoring what her mom said, “I don't know how to use a computer,”she admits.Unlike her 1995 autobiography, After All, her second book is less about life as an award- winning actress and more about living with diabetes（糖尿病）.All the money from the book is intended for the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation （JDRF）, an organization she serves as international chairman.But she hasn't always practiced what she teaches. In her book, she describes that awful day, almost 40 years ago, when she received two pieces of life-changing news. First, she had lost the baby she was carrying, and second, tests showed that she had diabetes. In a childlike act, she left the hospital and treated herself to a box of doughnuts（甜甜圈）.Years would pass before she realized she had to grow up—again—and take control of her diabetes, not let it control her. Only then did she kick her three-pack-a-day cigarette habit, overcome her addiction to alcohol, and begin to follow a balanced diet.Although her disease has affected her eyesight and forced her to the sidelines of the dance floor, she refuses to fall into self-pity."Everybody on earth can ask, ‘why me?’ about something or other," she insists.“It doesn't do any good. No one is immune（免疫的）to heartache, pain, and disappointments. Sometimes we can make things better by helping others. I've come to realize the importance of that as I've grown up this second time. I want to speak out and be as helpful as I can be.”4.When Mary received the life-changing news, she ______.

Mary MooreWhen Mary Moore began her high school in 1951, her mother told her, “Be sure and take a typing course so when this show business thing doesn' t work out, you'll have something to rely on.” Mary responded in typical teenage fashion. From that moment on, “the very last thing I ever thought about doing was taking a typing course，”she recalls.The show business thing worked out, of course. In her career, Mary won many awards. Only recently, when she began to write Growing Up Again, did she regret ignoring what her mom said, “I don't know how to use a computer,”she admits.Unlike her 1995 autobiography, After All, her second book is less about life as an award- winning actress and more about living with diabetes（糖尿病）.All the money from the book is intended for the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation （JDRF）, an organization she serves as international chairman.But she hasn't always practiced what she teaches. In her book, she describes that awful day, almost 40 years ago, when she received two pieces of life-changing news. First, she had lost the baby she was carrying, and second, tests showed that she had diabetes. In a childlike act, she left the hospital and treated herself to a box of doughnuts（甜甜圈）.Years would pass before she realized she had to grow up—again—and take control of her diabetes, not let it control her. Only then did she kick her three-pack-a-day cigarette habit, overcome her addiction to alcohol, and begin to follow a balanced diet.Although her disease has affected her eyesight and forced her to the sidelines of the dance floor, she refuses to fall into self-pity."Everybody on earth can ask, ‘why me?’ about something or other," she insists.“It doesn't do any good. No one is immune（免疫的）to heartache, pain, and disappointments. Sometimes we can make things better by helping others. I've come to realize the importance of that as I've grown up this second time. I want to speak out and be as helpful as I can be.”5.What can we know from the last paragraph?

Global Warming①Global warming may or not be the great environmental crisis of the 21st century, but regardless of whether it is or isn' t—we won't do much about it. We will argue over it and may even, as a nation, make some fairly solemn-sounding commitments to avoid it. But the more dramatic and meaningful these commitments seem, the less likely they are to be observed.②Al Gore calls global warming an “inconvenient truth,” as if merely recognizing it could put us on a path to a solution. But the real truth is that we don't know enough to believe global warming, and—without major technological breakthroughs—we can't do much about it.③From 2003 to 2050, the world's population is projected to grow from 6.4 billion to 9. 1 billion, a 42% increase. If energy use per person and technology remain the same, total energy use and greenhouse gas emissions (mainly, CO2) will be 42% higher in 2050. But that’s too low, because societies that grow richer use more energy. We need economic growth unless we condemn the world' s poor to their present poverty and freeze everyone else’s living standards. With modest growth, energy use and greenhouse emissions more than double by 2050.④No government will adopt rigid restrictions on economic growth and personal freedom (limits on electricity usage, driving and travel) that might cut back global warming. Still, politicians want to show they * re "doing somethingn. Consider the Kyoto Protocol. It allowed countries that joined to punish those that didn't. But it hasn't reduced CO2 emissions (up about 25% since 1990) , and many signatories didn't adopt tough enough policies to hit their 2008-2012 targets.⑤Practical conclusion is that if global warming is a potential disaster, the only solution is new technology. Only an aggressive research and development program might find ways of breaking our dependence on fossil fuels or dealing with it. The trouble with the global warming debate is that it has become a moral problem when it' s really engineering one. The inconvenient truth is that if we don't solve the engineering problem, we're helpless.1.Paragraph ①:

Global Warming①Global warming may or not be the great environmental crisis of the 21st century, but regardless of whether it is or isn' t—we won't do much about it. We will argue over it and may even, as a nation, make some fairly solemn-sounding commitments to avoid it. But the more dramatic and meaningful these commitments seem, the less likely they are to be observed.②Al Gore calls global warming an “inconvenient truth,” as if merely recognizing it could put us on a path to a solution. But the real truth is that we don't know enough to believe global warming, and—without major technological breakthroughs—we can't do much about it.③From 2003 to 2050, the world's population is projected to grow from 6.4 billion to 9. 1 billion, a 42% increase. If energy use per person and technology remain the same, total energy use and greenhouse gas emissions (mainly, CO2) will be 42% higher in 2050. But that’s too low, because societies that grow richer use more energy. We need economic growth unless we condemn the world' s poor to their present poverty and freeze everyone else’s living standards. With modest growth, energy use and greenhouse emissions more than double by 2050.④No government will adopt rigid restrictions on economic growth and personal freedom (limits on electricity usage, driving and travel) that might cut back global warming. Still, politicians want to show they * re "doing somethingn. Consider the Kyoto Protocol. It allowed countries that joined to punish those that didn't. But it hasn't reduced CO2 emissions (up about 25% since 1990) , and many signatories didn't adopt tough enough policies to hit their 2008-2012 targets.⑤Practical conclusion is that if global warming is a potential disaster, the only solution is new technology. Only an aggressive research and development program might find ways of breaking our dependence on fossil fuels or dealing with it. The trouble with the global warming debate is that it has become a moral problem when it' s really engineering one. The inconvenient truth is that if we don't solve the engineering problem, we're helpless.2.Paragraph ②:

Global Warming①Global warming may or not be the great environmental crisis of the 21st century, but regardless of whether it is or isn' t—we won't do much about it. We will argue over it and may even, as a nation, make some fairly solemn-sounding commitments to avoid it. But the more dramatic and meaningful these commitments seem, the less likely they are to be observed.②Al Gore calls global warming an “inconvenient truth,” as if merely recognizing it could put us on a path to a solution. But the real truth is that we don't know enough to believe global warming, and—without major technological breakthroughs—we can't do much about it.③From 2003 to 2050, the world's population is projected to grow from 6.4 billion to 9. 1 billion, a 42% increase. If energy use per person and technology remain the same, total energy use and greenhouse gas emissions (mainly, CO2) will be 42% higher in 2050. But that’s too low, because societies that grow richer use more energy. We need economic growth unless we condemn the world' s poor to their present poverty and freeze everyone else’s living standards. With modest growth, energy use and greenhouse emissions more than double by 2050.④No government will adopt rigid restrictions on economic growth and personal freedom (limits on electricity usage, driving and travel) that might cut back global warming. Still, politicians want to show they * re "doing somethingn. Consider the Kyoto Protocol. It allowed countries that joined to punish those that didn't. But it hasn't reduced CO2 emissions (up about 25% since 1990) , and many signatories didn't adopt tough enough policies to hit their 2008-2012 targets.⑤Practical conclusion is that if global warming is a potential disaster, the only solution is new technology. Only an aggressive research and development program might find ways of breaking our dependence on fossil fuels or dealing with it. The trouble with the global warming debate is that it has become a moral problem when it' s really engineering one. The inconvenient truth is that if we don't solve the engineering problem, we're helpless.3.Paragraph ③: